[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3 v2] XSAVE/XRSTOR fixes and enhancements



Keir Fraser wrote:
On 01/09/2010 08:26, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes. As I said in another email, actually it already breaks hvm guests
save/restore on platforms which supports XSAVE/XRSTOR.
Wow, so the last couple of Xen releases are broken for the latest Intel
platforms unless you specify no-xsave. Handy to know I guess.

Actually, hang on, Dexuan's patch only enabled XSAVE of FPU/SSE and didn't
make any other new state visible. We already save/restore FPU/SSE of course,
so I don't see why the code we already have is broken for HVM save/restore.
It's the adding of new state that we don't s/r that would be broken --- like
your patch to make AVX visible.

Well that's how it was explained to me at the time. Was that in fact wrong
and we are already broken for save/restore for some subtle unexplained
reason?

When XSAVE is enabled, it saves states to xsave_area in struct hvm_vcpu. But hvm_save_cpu_ctxt and hvm_load_cpu_ctxt don't save/restore FPU/SSE from xsave_area. So FPU/SSE states are incorrect after guest save/restore.

Regards,
Weidong
 -- Keir

Why is the feature flag stuff all stuffed in Xen itself rather than
xc_cpuid_x86.c, by the way? Shouldn't your change also be in the same place,
or (much preferably) all XSAVE related stuff be moved out into
libxc/xc_cpuid_x86.c?




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.