[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels
Jeremy Fitzhardinge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Testing the kernels"): > Regressions? Well, not really regressions in the view of the testing system, because the "tested" kernel tree was only just created so has all the failures, and xen-unstable was pushed manually recently. > > Can this be done in a way that doesn't involve waiting for you ? The > > testing system obviously pushes automatically and it would be good to > > publish those things in the right places without further manual > > intervention. > > Yes. I was planning on setting up a cronjob on kernel.org to update the > branch once we'd sorted out all the details. OK. I can arrange to prod some script of yours if you prefer. > > When we update the kernel version we intend to use, this should be a > > fast forward update and gated though the testing in the ordinary way, > > so it should update the same tag. Do you agree ? > > Hm. I was hoping at some point to have two kernels going through > testing. We're planning on supporting 2.6.32 for a long time, so we > should keep testing that. But I'd also like to start tracking upstream > more closely (starting with .36) which we should also test. OK, I guess I could have a different branch for my testing which tracks a different branch of yours. I've called this one "linux", as in Subject: [linux test] 2057: tolerable FAIL - PUSHED but perhaps I should rename it ? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |