|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 2 of 4] xen: introduce PHYSDEVOP_get_nr_pirqs
On 31/08/2010 13:49, "Stefano Stabellini" <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Couldn't it, like, pick the smallest available? :-) >> > > Well, it might still be useful to know the upper limit, besides linux > tends to choose the pirq == irq and the irqs for MSIs are high. > Xen does the same thing by the way. Well I'm just being fussy because it's yet another irq related interface and we seem to have so many already. Might-be-useful is different from must-have-now, and if you are allocating pirq==irq then that allocation strategy is not influenced by knowing nr_pirqs is it? -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |