Re: [Xen-devel] __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_IOMAP twice?

[Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Sun, 2010-08-22 at 13:06 +0100, Josip Rodin wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> I don't really understand this, but in xen-2.6.36/dom0/core there's this:
> 
> % git diff 0c2b1aa4c31830d3b9a40061d1b5f6c8cd837d57 
> 057e5006127460b11e03bf80227881c528b0590d
> diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> index 167ca78..0850bd6 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c
> @@ -1195,12 +1195,12 @@ asmlinkage void __init xen_start_kernel(void)
>  
>         pgd = (pgd_t *)xen_start_info->pt_base;
>  
> -       if (xen_initial_domain())
> -               __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_IOMAP;
> -       else
> +       if (!xen_initial_domain())
>                 __supported_pte_mask &= ~(_PAGE_PWT | _PAGE_PCD);
>  
>         __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_IOMAP;
> +
> +       __supported_pte_mask |= _PAGE_IOMAP;
>         /* Don't do the full vcpu_info placement stuff until we have a
>            possible map and a non-dummy shared_info. */
>         per_cpu(xen_vcpu, 0) = &HYPERVISOR_shared_info->vcpu_info[0];
> 
> 
> What's the point of doing the same thing twice at the end? Maybe it's
> a mis-merge?

Yes, I think its a mismerge. The same thing was in xen/stable-2.6.32.x
until recently as well.

Ian.




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel