Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Brendan Cully writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH] Remus breaks the build"):
> You are correct, the device is just plumbing. But it isn't any extra
> code, at least for pvops -- IFB is carried in upstream linux. You
> could probably use a second-level bridge or tap or policy routing or
> something to get the same effect, but I don't think I see the
> advantage. You're certainly welcome to put together an alternative
> approach for comparison.

Ah, I see.  I hadn't realised it was in upstream.  Fine, then.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel