Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Stefano Stabellini writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 8] [RFC] libxl: 
autogenerate type definitions and destructor functions"):
> I really like the concept of this series, and for the moment I have
> applied patches 1 and 2, I'll wait for the other issues to be settled
> before applying the rest.
> In particular I agree with Gianni and Ian on the fact that libxl data
> structures should live in a separate idl-like file.

Yes, all excellent stuff, thanks Ian.

> Regarding the memory policy: I am all for explicit freeing by the
> caller.

Yes.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel