Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 3] libxl: memory leaks

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 03/08/10 11:18, Gianni Tedesco (3P) wrote:
> I wasn't aware that was the original design. It's certainly not the case
> right now.
it has unfortunately diverged in some calls indeed.

> AFAICS that scheme would only guarantee everything has been freed if the
> caller calls ctx_free() at appropriate points. If libxl were used in a
> daemon, for example, it would not be simple to come up with a scheme
> that guarantees memory bounds that are independent from uptime.
This scheme is already in place in the ocaml binding

--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel