[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] BLKTAPCTRL[2375]: blktapctrl_linux.c:86: blktap0 open failed, tap: vs. tap2:
On 27/07/2010 07:21, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: >>> That sounds like a lot of fallout on xen-users. >>> Especially for people who just want their guests to boot. >>> >>> Maybe the whole notation should have rather been some _optional_ blktap >>> = {1|2} cfg key, only for those who actually care? >> >> FWIW, I completely agree with this. >> > > Yeah, especially when blktap2 is the only available on in pvops dom0 kernels.. > All the users have tap:something in their cfgfiles currently.. Well the patch to make the distinction is currently in xen-unstable and xen-4.0. Should it be reverted from one or both? Actually it is up to IanJ or Stefano to decide on that now. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |