[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.1

To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 16:49:49 +0100
Cc: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Dan Magenheimer <dan.magenheimer@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Stefano Stabellini <Stefano.Stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Fri, 23 Jul 2010 08:50:50 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Keir Fraser writes ("Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 
4.0.1"):
> Er, no. There's still one email per changeset. You can ignore the merge
> changesets: they're all trivial auto merges, and I'm not sure why they end
> up with an associated diff, it must be how mercurial consolidates and merges
> a branch.

Right.

We could add the separate tools tree to the patchbot but it would
result in every tools patch being mailed out twice.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- RE: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.1
  - From: Dan Magenheimer
- Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.1
  - From: Keir Fraser

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH]: Remove special case for mixed hvm/pv disks which may prevent boot
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] hg ignore libxl lex/yacc detritus
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.1
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] Re: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.