Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0/3] libxl stubdom API cleanup

[Vincent Hanquez <vincent.hanquez@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 09/07/10 09:17, Tim Deegan wrote:
> > Is it necessary to pull the mechanism out along with the policy though?
> >      
> Or, if we're taking some mechanism out, couldn't we take _all_ the
> mechanism out?
Which one do you have in minds ?

> The idea of a stub domain doesn't seem like one that
> libxl necessarily needs to know about.
>    
yes, indeed. the stubdom create could move as a xl helper.
On the ocaml side reimplementing stubdom create is a trivial composition 
of smaller libxl function (create/build/add devs) which are already bound.
--
Vincent

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel