Xen project Mailing List

Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugger documentation.

To: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

From: Bruce Edge <bruce.edge@xxxxxxxxx>

Date: Tue, 6 Jul 2010 16:40:56 -0700

Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>

Delivery-date: Tue, 06 Jul 2010 16:41:48 -0700

Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=UrK5UPnkRrhQCIeI7m84pdF3xYq4UxQNwBU3zO5vGNlpXsUTopelbGF1ZZrEWzQUqn oGA4NsIn8pyONCXGt6Z9xTlVNlODdFB2xQQ75IdLBybjWjey2jS1BgdluUdSRmHDcbUk nPwPTGNan6eHQLeHoGW+7RN4HhTc6tyH5l76M=

List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Jul 6, 2010 at 4:57 AM, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Bruce Edge writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] State of gdbsx in xen-4.0-testing.hg and debugger documentation."):

> Here is a patch to enable gdbsx by default.

Thanks. Is it against 4.0-testing as it seems to be ? I think we
probably want this against xen-unstable, against which your patch
doesn't apply.

Ian, here's an unstable patch:

diff -Naur xen-unstable.hg-2010-07-06/tools/Makefile xen-unstable.hg/tools/Makefile

--- xen-unstable.hg-2010-07-06/tools/Makefile 2010-07-06 14:40:54.000000000 -0700

+++ xen-unstable.hg/tools/Makefile 2010-07-06 16:15:15.000000000 -0700

@@ -35,6 +35,7 @@

SUBDIRS-y += libxl

SUBDIRS-y += remus

SUBDIRS-$(CONFIG_X86) += xenpaging

+SUBDIRS-y += debugger/gdbsx

# These don't cross-compile

ifeq ($(XEN_COMPILE_ARCH),$(XEN_TARGET_ARCH))

@@ -114,3 +115,9 @@

$(buildmakevars2shellvars); \

$(MAKE) -C ioemu-dir clean; \

+subdir-clean-debugger/gdbsx:

+ $(MAKE) -C debugger/gdbsx clean

+subdir-install-debugger/gdbsx:

+ $(MAKE) -C debugger/gdbsx install

-------------cut----------------

Thanks

-Bruce

> I suppose it would be cleaner to eliminate the debugger dir as gdbsx is the
> only one under there that's used and that would enable the tools/Rules.mk
> templates to cover the
> subdir-clean-gdbsx:
> subdir-install-gdbsx
> targets and not require them to be explicit in tools/Makefile

Well, yes, until we got another debugger again.

> Also, I don't know if
> SUBDIRS-y += debugger/gdbsx
> should be conditional on any type of target, CONFIG_X86 or?

I'm happy to enable it and get the people who find it breaks to
tell us what conditions mean it needs to be disabled :-).

Ian.

_______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel