|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: Xen-unstable save error
On 21/06/2010 14:37, "Michal Novotny" <minovotn@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > My guest is RHEL-5 i386 guest but this seems that the suspend port is > missing. AFAIK, you started using the SUSPEND_CANCEL some time ago which > requires the modified kernel. > > Isn't it possible that's the issue or how is it with the SUSPEND_CANCEL > functionality? SUSPEND_CANCEL is a different thing. The suspend port is simply a quicker way for suspend notifications to be passed back and forth between the guest and the dom0 toolstack. We fall back okay if the guest kernel does not support the new faster method. I'm not sure why the domain restore operation fails. Unfortunately some error messages are now expected in the logs, since Remus functionality went into the tree. So it's hard to work out what the first error is. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
 |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |