[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM

To: Stefano Stabellini <stefano.stabellini@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 13:38:17 -0400
Cc: "jeremy@xxxxxxxx" <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx" <ddutile@xxxxxxxxxx>, "linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Delivery-date: Thu, 17 Jun 2010 10:39:40 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

> /* vector callbacks are better than PCI interrupts to receive event
     ^V
>  * channel notifications because we can receive vector callbacks on any
>  * vcpu and we don't need PCI support or APIC interactions */
                                                            ^.
> 
> is it good enough?
Just two things..

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

References:
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 01/12] Add support for hvm_op
  - From: stefano . stabellini
- [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
  - From: stefano . stabellini
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
- Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
  - From: Stefano Stabellini

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] IOMMU and AMD 890fx
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 03/12] evtchn delivery on HVM
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.