Re: [Xen-devel] Name of event-channel and other devices vs. udev

[Bastian Blank <waldi@xxxxxxxxxx>]

On Thu, May 27, 2010 at 03:37:49PM -0700, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 05/27/2010 03:26 PM, Bastian Blank wrote:
> > To possibilities:
> > - Fix the error detection in this crude device creation code.
> > - Rip it out and always rely on the system to provide the devices.
> > For Debian I already decided to use the later one.
> Yes, that seems like the cleanest approach.  Does it need any udev
> config to get that right?  In particular, is there a mechanism to
> autoload misc device modules?

No, there is no autoloading possible; neither now nor with the patch.
The default udev config is correct in this case.

Bastian

-- 
Warp 7 -- It's a law we can live with.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel