[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] PV on HVM
On Mon, 10 May 2010, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > On 05/10/2010 01:40 PM, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: > > On 05/10/2010 07:20 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> this is the updated version of the PV on HVM series: many bugs have been > >> fixed and VIRQ_TIMER support has been added. > >> In order to be able to use VIRQ_TIMER and to improve performances you > >> need two other patches to Xen to implement the vector callback mechanism > >> for event channel delivery and to export some time related hypercalls to > >> HVM guests too. > >> > >> This series is based on a standard 2.6.32 tree, a git tree is also > >> available here: > >> > >> git://xenbits.xen.org/people/sstabellini/linux-pvhvm.git > >> > >> branch name 2.6.32-pvhvm. > >> > >> > > I'm confused. These patches don't seem to correspond with that branch. > > Are these the same as the branch but rearranged, or something else? > > > > I see, it looks like the condensed version of the branch. I really > prefer you'd keep the patches incremental: its much easier to review the > incremental changes rather than folding updates into the > already-reviewed base patches. Folding down is a late-stage process for > submission, and not something that should be done prematurely. > Yep, I guess I have been overzealous: I folded the small commits in 'patch size' commits and then I sent them over. However the git tree still contains all the original incremental changes. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |