[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after xen_pause_requested
- To: "Liu, Jinsong" <jinsong.liu@xxxxxxxxx>
- From: Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 16:49:34 +0100
- Cc: xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Zhai, Edwin" <edwin.zhai@xxxxxxxxx>, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx>, Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "alex.nixon@xxxxxxxxxx" <alex.nixon@xxxxxxxxxx>, Fraser <Keir.Fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir
- Delivery-date: Thu, 22 Apr 2010 08:50:31 -0700
- List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Liu, Jinsong writes ("RE: [Xen-devel] [Question] vcpu-set before or after
xen_pause_requested"):
> I'm not quite clear your idea. Per my understanding, a new xenstore
> key name cannot avoid the issue of old key, like timeout value,
> malfunction guest, ...
How does the current arrangement deal with an attempt to "xm vcpu-set"
a PV guest which doesn't support that operation ?
Ian.
_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
