[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] blktap2 device creation failing after 162 devices w/Xen4.0 + linux-2.6.31.13
On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 12:30 -0400, John McCullough wrote: > On 04/14/2010 01:24 AM, Daniel Stodden wrote: > > On Wed, 2010-04-14 at 01:40 -0400, John McCullough wrote: > > > >> Daniel, > >> > >> That did the trick and got us up to 256, Thanks! > >> > >> Out of curiosity, what's standing in the way of more devices? > >> > > I must admit I never tried. Lack of maybe a couple sparse tables here > > and there? > > > > > >> We tried raising the MAX_*_DEVICES constants in these files to 512, but > >> didn't have any luck: > >> linux-2.6-pvops.git/drivers/xen/blktap/blktap.h > >> tools/blktap2/include/blktaplib.h > >> tools/blktap/lib/blktaplib.h > >> > >> (The error is now "vbd open failed: -6") > >> > > That would be an ENXIO, probably while trying to open the ring (can you > > verify that with an strace -f?) > > > > Looks like it is ENXIO: > > ... > [pid 4154] open("/dev/xen/blktap-2/blktap256", O_RDWR <unfinished ...> > > [pid 4153] close(4) = 0 > [pid 4153] fcntl(3, F_GETFL) = 0 (flags O_RDONLY) > [pid 4153] brk(0) = 0xa1e000 > [pid 4153] brk(0xa3f000) = 0xa3f000 > [pid 4153] fstat(3, {st_mode=S_IFIFO|0600, st_size=0, ...}) = 0 > [pid 4153] mmap(NULL, 4096, PROT_READ|PROT_WRITE, > MAP_PRIVATE|MAP_ANONYMOUS, -1, 0) = 0x7f6844b40000 > [pid 4153] lseek(3, 0, SEEK_CUR) = -1 ESPIPE (Illegal seek) > [pid 4153] read(3, <unfinished ...> > > [pid 4154] <... open resumed> ) = -1 ENXIO (No such device or > address) > [pid 4154] gettimeofday({1271262219, 398530}, NULL) = 0 > [pid 4154] sendto(0, "<27>Apr 14 09:23:39 tapdisk2[415"..., 115, > MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 115 > [pid 4154] close(3) = 0 > [pid 4154] gettimeofday({1271262219, 398836}, NULL) = 0 > [pid 4154] sendto(0, "<30>Apr 14 09:23:39 tapdisk2[415"..., 109, > MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 109 > [pid 4154] gettimeofday({1271262219, 399161}, NULL) = 0 > [pid 4154] sendto(0, "<27>Apr 14 09:23:39 tapdisk2[415"..., 86, > MSG_NOSIGNAL, NULL, 0) = 86 > [pid 4154] write(1, "-6: vbd open failed: -6\n", 24) = 24 > ... (err, ioctl to control, close and exit) Yep. So that's the ring device, which was apparently created ok but remains somehow inaccessible. Like I said, I think this fails earlier in the call stack than juyst blktap_ring_file_operations. Just from looking at some code I don't immediately see the issue. I guess this presently returns only halfway through chrdev_open. Broken device registration somewhere? Does it take more magic to register minors beyond 8 bit? Thanks for the trace. Can't spent much time on it right now. Want to take it on? Daniel _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |