Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: build fix

[Christoph Egger <Christoph.Egger@xxxxxxx>]

On Tuesday 13 April 2010 17:04:00 Ian Jackson wrote:
> Christoph Egger writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] libxl: build fix"):
> > On NetBSD, the SIG* defines are in <sys/signal.h> which is just
> > included by <signal.h>
> > On NetBSD, both works.
>
> The correct way to discover what the right #include is is not to go on
> a wild goose chase through headers.  It is to read appropriate
> documentation, such as SuSv3:
>   http://www.opengroup.org/onlinepubs/009695399/basedefs/signal.h.html
> Every function or symbol that's in SuS has next to its description a
> statement of what header file(s) are needed.

Yes, you are right. It's my fault. It should have read the manpage. It states 
this clearly, too.

Christoph

-- 
---to satisfy European Law for business letters:
Advanced Micro Devices GmbH
Karl-Hammerschmidt-Str. 34, 85609 Dornach b. Muenchen
Geschaeftsfuehrer: Andrew Bowd, Thomas M. McCoy, Giuliano Meroni
Sitz: Dornach, Gemeinde Aschheim, Landkreis Muenchen
Registergericht Muenchen, HRB Nr. 43632


_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel