[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: [PATCH] [retry 3] Refactor Xen support for Intel Turbo Boost
> -----Original Message----- > From: Mark Langsdorf [mailto:mark.langsdorf@xxxxxxx] > Sent: Thursday, April 01, 2010 3:25 AM > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Yu, Ke > Subject: [PATCH] [retry 3] Refactor Xen support for Intel Turbo Boost > > diff -r ebd84be3420a -r e86769595f59 tools/libxc/xenctrl.h > --- a/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h Tue Mar 30 18:31:39 2010 +0100 > +++ b/tools/libxc/xenctrl.h Wed Mar 31 13:58:13 2010 -0500 > @@ -1281,7 +1281,10 @@ > union { > xc_userspace_t userspace; > xc_ondemand_t ondemand; > + uint32_t pad[4]; > } u; > + > + int32_t turbo_enabled; > }; xen_get_cpufreq_para.u and xc_get_cpufreq_para.u should have the same definition, since current code (xc_get_cpufreq_para function) use memcpy to transfer data between xen_get_cpufreq_para.u and xc_get_cpufreq_para.u. So padding is not needed here, as we discussed in previous email. > > int xc_get_cpufreq_para(int xc_handle, int cpuid, > diff -r ebd84be3420a -r e86769595f59 > xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h > --- a/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h Tue Mar 30 18:31:39 > 2010 +0100 > +++ b/xen/include/acpi/cpufreq/processor_perf.h Wed Mar 31 13:58:13 > 2010 -0500 > @@ -9,6 +9,7 @@ > int get_cpu_id(u8); > int powernow_cpufreq_init(void); > unsigned int powernow_register_driver(void); > +unsigned int get_measured_perf(unsigned int cpu, unsigned int flag); Shouldn't this be in patch 3? _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |