[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 (RC9)
> From: Ian Pratt [mailto:Ian.Pratt@xxxxxxxxxxxxx] > To: Joanna Rutkowska; Keir Fraser > Subject: RE: [Xen-devel] New release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 (RC9) > > > http://xenbits.xensource.com/ > > That page seriously needs fixing to correctly reflect the active trees. > > > one can see linux-2.6.18-xen.hg repo as a sub-repo of the just- > created > > xen-4.0-testing.hg... I was under impression that 4.0 would be using > > pvops0 kernel *only* and that you would not support 2.6.18 anymore > for > > this hypervisor... > > I don't think it makes sense for anyone to really be using 2.6.18 > anymore. Sorry, I have to disagree. The only real issue with 2.6.18 is old drivers. If your machine works fine with 2.6.18 dom0, it is still very likely the most stable and fully-functional dom0 bits and has been tested with many previous releases of Xen and was the default for pre-4.0 until a few months ago. One need only look at the changelog to see it is still actively used: http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg I have used this tree for all of my 4.0 development and testing. You will likely have problems with it on newer hardware... though I have been developing/testing fine on a Nehalem box. > The 2.6.27 tree is probably the most widely tested right now, and is > shipping in commercial xen distros, and xen.org's Xen Cloud Platform > and XCI. I don't want to get into a numbers argument, but all Oracle VM shipments are using a 2.6.18-based dom0. And I'd venture to guess that, since most enterprise shops rarely move immediately to the leading edge release, the vast majority of commercial Xen users are using a 2.6.18-based dom0. > pvops is certainly where the development effort is currently focussed, > and hopefully what the commercial distros will all be using later this > year[*]. Yes, agreed. This is definitely the direction. But I don't think it's time to throw away linux-2.6.18-xen.hg quite yet (the suggestion of which is what triggered my allergic reaction here :-). > > Can you shed some light on this issue -- why is this kernel repo > there, > > and what kernel will *really* be the official and stable option for > Xen 4? > > What will be part of the next week release? Keir already answered this tersely, but let me explain further (and others can correct me if I am wrong). There IS NO official dom0 for Xen 4.0 from xen.org. Xen 4.0 is a hypervisor not a virtualization distro. Similarly, Linux 2.6.33 is a kernel release, not an OS distro. Distros of both are free to choose whatever other components work best for their customers. So IMHO the http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg tree is still maintained because it is still useful for a significant number of developers. P.S. I *do* plan to switch to pvops... but I've been saying that for over a year now ;-) _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |