[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] Re: [Patch RFC] ttm: nouveau accelerated on Xen pv-ops kernel
I'm adding dri-devel@ to CC, since this suggested patch touches TTM code, and none of the Nouveau code. TTM patches go via dri-devel@. Thanks. On Wed, 10 Mar 2010 18:51:21 +0530 Arvind R <arvino55@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > Hi, > Following is a simple patch that is needed in nouveau to get > accelerated X on a Xen dom0 pv_ops kernel. The kernel is jeremy's > 2.6.31.6 as of 20100222. The whole gpu tree of nouveau (which is > almost the mainline merge), was substituted into the kernel-tree. > All components of X (mesa, Xorg-server-7.5, xf86-nouveau, libdrm) > used of the same day. > > Patch: > diff -Naur nouveau-kernel.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c > nouveau-kernel.new/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c > --- nouveau-kernel.orig/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c 2010-01-27 > 10:19:28.000000000 +0530 > +++ nouveau-kernel.new/drivers/gpu/drm/ttm/ttm_bo_vm.c 2010-03-10 > 17:28:59.000000000 +0530 > @@ -271,7 +271,10 @@ > */ > > vma->vm_private_data = bo; > - vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED | VM_IO | VM_MIXEDMAP | > VM_DONTEXPAND; > + vma->vm_flags |= VM_RESERVED | VM_MIXEDMAP | > VM_DONTEXPAND; > + if (!((bo->mem.placement & TTM_PL_MASK_MEM) & > TTM_PL_FLAG_TT)) > + vma->vm_flags |= VM_IO; > + vma->vm_page_prot = vma_get_vm_prot(vma->vm_flags); > return 0; > out_unref: > ttm_bo_unref(&bo); > > This patch is necessary because, in Xen, PFN of a page is > virtualised. So physical addresses > for DMA programming needs to use the MFN. Xen transparently does > the correct translation > using the _PAGE_IOMEM prot-bit in the PTE. If the bit is set, > then Xen assumes that the backing > memory is in the IOMEM space, and PFN equals MFN. If not set, > page_to_pfn() returns MFN. > > The patch enables the ttm_bo_vm_fault() handler to behave > correctly under Xen, and has no > side-effects on normal (not under Xen) operations. The use of > TTM_PL_FLAG_TT in the > check assumes that all other placements are backed by device > memory or IO. If there are > any other placements that use system memory, that flag has to be > OR'ed into the check. > > The above patch has no implications on a normal kernel or a Xen > pv_ops kernel booted without > the Xen hypervisor. My testing is on a debian-lenny environment > on a Core2 processor with > nVidia GeForce 9400 GT. -- Pekka Paalanen http://www.iki.fi/pq/ _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |