Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/11] libxl: Per-domain data storage for the convenience of the library user

[Ian Jackson <Ian.Jackson@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Vincent Hanquez writes ("Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 08/11] libxl: Per-domain data 
storage for the   convenience of the library user"):
> XCP doesn't need a "locking" mechanism that use the name in xenstore for 
> migration.

This is an unreasonable response, and I think it goes to the heart of
the problem here.

xl is a first-class caller of libxl, not some second-rate unimportant
thing.  Every requirement of xl on libxl is a real requirement.

The real problem seems to me that you are only willing to agree to
features and API properties which are useful for your "toolstacks",
and not ones which are required for xl.  This is not acceptable.

Ian.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel