Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 0 of 5] PV on HVM Xen

[Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>]

On 03/17/2010 08:17 AM, Stefano Stabellini wrote:
> Finally I would still like the call to xen_guest_init to be moved
> afterwards: if we move it after kvm_guest_init we can be pretty sure
> that upstream is going to accept it. Besides ACPI is currently working
> with your patch series applied, when and if we break ACPI we'll worry
> about it.
>    
Why/how does ACPI get broken?  I think that's something we should 
definitely avoid doing.
    J

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel