[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] RE: [Xen-devel] RE: "monitor"-ed address and IPI reduction
Keir Fraser wrote: > On 10/03/2010 05:09, "Wei, Gang" <gang.wei@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> I agree that we can have a try on this. Waking up cpu by mem write >>> should be more efficient for monitor/mwait case. >> >> Here is a patch to monitor "sortirq_pending" instead of "current". >> The IPI reduction part may be a bit complex, can we hold it for >> post-4.0? > > This whole thing is for post 4.0 now. That's fine. Jimmy _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |