RE: [Xen-devel] live migration fails (assert in shadow_hash_delete)

["Xu, Jiajun" <jiajun.xu@xxxxxxxxx>]

Our normal testing covers local live migration testing for HVM with Pv_ops. 
These cases can pass in Xen-4.0.0 RCx testing. 
And I just now tried HVM live migration between two machines with xen c/s 20964 
and Pv_ops, it can work.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> [mailto:xen-devel-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Keir Fraser
> Sent: Tuesday, February 23, 2010 7:00 PM
> To: Tim Deegan; Devdutt Patnaik; Ian Jackson
> Cc: Ashish Bijlani; xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] live migration fails (assert in shadow_hash_delete)
> 
> On 23/02/2010 10:46, "Tim Deegan" <Tim.Deegan@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> > At 10:19 +0000 on 23 Feb (1266920353), Devdutt Patnaik wrote:
> >> We just used the xen-unstable version from 2 weeks ago, and haven't really
> >> modified it.
> >> We tried this with 64-bit versions of 2.6.31.6 and 2.6.32.8 DomU kernels.
> >
> > OK.  This really needs to be fixed to the 4.0 release.  Keir, have we
> > had any other testing on 64-bit PV live migrations?
> 
> Localhost migrations were just added to the automated tests. But I think
> maybe they are trivially failing due to trying to do them via the 'xl'
> interface, which doesn't support it(!). Ian?
> 
> In short, there's probably been little or no testing of live migration in
> the recent past, as I don't think Intel tests it either.
> 
>  -- Keir
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel