[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] current not very current (vs curr_vcpu)
On Sat, 20 Feb 2010 07:45:26 +0000 Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 20/02/2010 03:50, "Mukesh Rathor" <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > ah, I see what's going on. context_switch() is scheduling idle > > vcpu, and calls continue_idle_domain() to > > reset_stack_and_jump(idle_loop). well, reset_stack_and_jump() is > > setting rsp to guest_cpu_user_regs(), and interrupt is coming right > > at that instant. so: > > > > diff = (char *)guest_cpu_user_regs() - (char *)(r) is 0 > > > > and as a result, guest_mode(regs) == true. > > Well, I don't see how this scenario works. If rsp==g_c_u_r() at the > instant the interrupt comes in, then the stack frame for the > interrupt will be *above* g_c_u_r(). Thus 'diff' in guest_mode() will > evaluate non-zero and positive, and regs->{rip,rsp} should point at > hypervisor code/stack. > > Also: in your original email you said regs.rsp pointed at dom0 stack. > That doesn't tally with you saying that rsp==g_c_u_r() (an address in > hypervisor space) immediately before the interrupt, in this email. > Regs->rsp in the scenario you describe here should be exactly equal > to g_c_u_r(). > > -- Keir > Ok, I think I found it. Initially, my printk in serial_rx() showed regs == ffff82c48030ff28 == guest_cpu_user_regs This led me down to reset_stack_and_jump where sp is set to g_c_u_r. Anyways, on this big box, I'm using virtual serial via the service processor. So, it looks like serial interrupts are not going thru do_IRQ(), but ns16550_poll(). __do_softirq -> execute_timer -> ns16550_poll -> serial_rx_interrupt. However, in ns16550_poll(): struct cpu_user_regs *regs = guest_cpu_user_regs(); <------ The cpu is clearly running idle_vcpu, so current is correctly pointing to idle vcpu. But guest_mode() is showing guest mode incorrectly. I'm not much familiar with ns16550 stuff, so cant' think of a fix other than just setting regs to current stack pointer in ns16550_poll(). __asm__ ( "movq %%rsp,%0" : "=r" (val)); struct cpu_user_regs *regs = val; Let me know if you like the fix and I'll submit a patch. thanks, Mukesh _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |