Re: SOLVED: Re: [Xen-devel] Issue with pv_ops Kernel 2.6.31.6 and Xen [yinghai@xxxxxxxxxx: [PATCH 01/35] x86: fix sci on ioapic 1]

[M A Young <m.a.young@xxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, 17 Feb 2010, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:

> On Tue, Feb 16, 2010 at 01:51:05PM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> > Yes.  At the moment xen/next is based on plain 2.6.32 because that is
> > also an ancestor version of mainline git development.  Once the 2.6.32
> > tree basically works (which should be close), then I can merge all the
> > stable branch changes onto it and call it "xen/stable" or something.
> So that means I should try xen/next now? :)
I wouldn't recommend it yet. I have been trying it, but I haven't yet got 
it to boot, and my most recent attempt a couple of days ago didn't even 
build (the errors were
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c: In function 'exists_connecting_device':
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c:791: error: 'xenbus_frontend' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c:791: error: (Each undeclared identifier 
is reported only once
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c:791: error: for each function it appears 
in.)
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c: In function 'wait_for_devices':
drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.c:863: error: 'xenbus_frontend' undeclared 
(first use in this function)
make[3]: *** [drivers/xen/xenbus/xenbus_probe.o] Error 1

        Michael Young

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel