[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Xen-users] Re: [Xen-devel] DomU as Dom0?
- To: Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx>
- From: Sassy Natan <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 12 Feb 2010 08:23:41 +0200
- Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Xen List <xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Delivery-date: Thu, 11 Feb 2010 22:24:23 -0800
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=MyJ4ZlmOzSZplFXf2e+HUEGAJQo5GbF+kAWsKeu95YD4EHRcnIuEEx/m45PFIiTgiS CSss7b31cAaSqnMMNX527rfDky6k6tERxmvladzOfbyy0Wb+qczwXXX5aUG3fApBgKG7 oqCJBBZlwUGvyiPYatj7GIEbgabKoIIlhzIdQ=
- List-id: Xen user discussion <xen-users.lists.xensource.com>
OK,
Thanks for the answers
Sassy On Thu, Feb 11, 2010 at 11:41 PM, Daniel Stodden <daniel.stodden@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 2010-02-11 at 14:43 -0500, Sassy Natan wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
>
> Can I run on DomU a Dom0 Kernel? So that This DomU will act as a Dom0
> for other DomU on top of it?
Domains don't stack. There's no concept of one domain running on top of
a different one, not even with the original dom0.
But many of the tasks dom0 performs on behalf of domU's could be done by
other domUs as well. Primary example would be I/O virtualization for
normal, non-privileged guests.
So the dependency graph you can build for a 'service' model is *much*
more flexible than the rather static 3-level block scheme depicting the
bare binary interface.
That's maybe not the answer you were looking for.
If you're rather looking for recursive virtualization, I don't think
that's going to fly all that well either.
Daniel
_______________________________________________
Xen-users mailing list
Xen-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-users
|
