[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

[Xen-devel] Re: [RFC SWIOTLB-0.4]

To: konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx
From: FUJITA Tomonori <fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:17:31 +0900
Cc: fujita.tomonori@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, jeremy@xxxxxxxx, xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, chrisw@xxxxxxxxxxxx, iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, dwmw2@xxxxxxxxxxxxx, alex.williamson@xxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 03 Feb 2010 16:18:25 -0800
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Wed,  3 Feb 2010 12:08:01 -0500
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Attached is a set of eleven RFC patches that split the SWIOTLB library in
> two layers: core, and dma_ops related functions.

What's the point of splitting swiotlb.c? Why can't you just export
some of functions in swiotlb.c?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC SWIOTLB-0.4]
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

References:
- [Xen-devel] Re: [PATCH 02/15] [swiotlb] Add swiotlb_engine structure for tracking multiple software IO TLBs.
  - From: FUJITA Tomonori
- [Xen-devel] [RFC SWIOTLB-0.4]
  - From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Q on netfront/netback driver
Next by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Q on netfront/netback driver
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] [PATCH 11/11] [swiotlb] move dma_ops functions to swiotlb.c.
Next by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [RFC SWIOTLB-0.4]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.