[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH][v2] Hybrid extension support in Xen
On Tuesday 02 February 2010 22:03:31 Keir Fraser wrote: > On 02/02/2010 13:37, "Sheng Yang" <sheng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >>> 1. Enable SMP support through VCPU_OP in arch_set_info_guest(). > >> > >> What does that mean and why would we want it? > > > > It's not a good description, sorry... We need a entry address and boot up > > code AP. For that purpose, I reuse VCPUOP_initialise and VCPUOP_up > > hypercall. The former guest set the entry address of AP, the later one > > boot up them. For this, I add some code in arch_set_info_guest() to > > initialize the AP(mostly what we did after INIT-SIPI-SIPI sequence), > > that's what I means here... > > Okay, so that leads to the obvious next question: why do you want to avoid > using INIT-SIPI-SIPI? > Because we don't have IOAPIC/LAPIC... -- regards Yang, Sheng _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |