Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] evtchn_do_upcall: Fix logic to start correctly at "last processed port + 1"

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Sorry, it is there now:
 http://xenbits.xensource.com/linux-2.6.18-xen.hg

 K.

On 29/01/2010 09:04, "Kaushik Kumar Ram" <kaushik@xxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I don't see changeset linux-2.6.18-xen:988. I agree pre-incrementing is
> better. I am fine as long as the code is fixed.
> 
> -Kaushik
> 
> On Jan 29, 2010, at 2:43 AM, Keir Fraser wrote:
> 
>> On 29/01/2010 05:34, "Kaushik Kumar Ram" <kaushik@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>>> # HG changeset patch
>>> # User kaushik
>>> # Date 1264742860 21600
>>> # Node ID de3e05e5eec28aa332ae1aa35a2edf97ded769f5
>>> # Parent  91224343eeee460c9aafdaadc1bdedab54e92256
>>> Fix the logic to start correctly at "last processed port + 1" in
>>> evtchn_do_upcall.
>>> 
>>> Signed-off-by: Kaushik Kumar Ram <kaushik@xxxxxxxx>
>> 
>> Take a look at linux-2.6.18-xen:988, which is a (significant)
>> reinterpretation of your patch. I think some confusion and bugs arise from
>> pre-incrementing the loop indexes, so I changed back to post-incrementing as
>> we used to do. I think the code is a fair bit clearer. Hopefully it also
>> works just as well!
>> 
>> Thanks,
>> Keir
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>> 
> 



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel