[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] max number of physical cpus


  • To: Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Andrew Lyon <andrew.lyon@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 21:37:28 +0000
  • Cc: "Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 26 Jan 2010 13:37:50 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=X9Wrm2WFcmiZLegkRNIHui11i9xKpDXZv9+w5KigD5Pw2Fz2TEgj/JxgywqWjGuoiB LYVcRaqYalX0FGw4i8/aNir1a9wsUt6kXPDfIqrRiXMkzTD3Kra8hOfD0P0A9pBb7h0n IZ2FF7T7BVsDP4QvnxCYy4qCnd9sbI63jnv6g=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

On Tue, Jan 26, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Mukesh Rathor <mukesh.rathor@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I kinda vaguely remember seeing a patch while ago to support 128
> physical cpus by hypervisor, I believe it was from Jan B. Now looking
> for it i'm unable to find it, i only see HVM vcpu patch for 128 vcpus
> in my search.
>
> Firstly, is it OK to increase NR_CPUS to 128, and secondly is it ok to
> do so in 3.4.3-rc2-pre tree, or is it 4.0 only?
>
> thanks much,
> mukesh
>
> _______________________________________________
> Xen-devel mailing list
> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>

There exists a x86 system with 128 cpus? What is it?

andy

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.