[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] xen.git plans / 2.6.32 long-term stable kernel


  • To: Josip Rodin <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Sassy Natan <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 22:48:59 +0200
  • Cc: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <jeremy@xxxxxxxx>, Xen-devel <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 12:49:23 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=T6V1cnOunTvDZ0oZbhqSXGFBA2HIwNOcbQPpP801ItbBhsdz0LFg2DVRutynjDwMRI L/MaX4EIU1DDwZ/jVXldSe78tVPDSiqJ1fhsSRrebLM5S/ISea7uZcNxJhO31t2CgvEx 1pwOSidb4t7yMBESH2F3tG65ABLeUkucruli8=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Did u find kernel 2.6.31.6+paravirt_ops dom0 and Xen 3.4.2 I guess stable enough?
I did found some issues with domain restore, but indeed this seems like the best virtualization systems.
 
Thanks
Sassy


 
On Mon, Jan 25, 2010 at 3:38 PM, Josip Rodin <joy@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, Jan 20, 2010 at 10:40:02AM -0800, Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote:
> On 01/20/2010 02:18 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>> It seems Linux 2.6.32 will be a long term supported stable release,
>> ending up in multiple distros..
>>
>> Distros that are probably going to use it:
>>
>>      - Debian 6.0 ("Squeeze")
>>      - Ubuntu 10.04 LTS ("Lucid Lynx")
>>      - RHEL6
>>
>> Please correct me if I'm wrong :)
>>
>> kernel.org developers are also going to make 2.6.32 a long-term stable release.
>> (announced yesterday).
>
> Yep, that all works out nicely doesn't it?

Can you please update xen.git to have a branch based off
stable/linux-2.6.32.y.git ? Right now it's still a stable .31.6 and mainline
.32-rc5 in there, so we're missing a couple of months worth of bug fixes.

Since this kernel is going to enter so many stable distribution releases,
it would really be a good idea to get that exact combination widely tested
'in the wild'.

I'm asking particularly because the current Debian dom0 kernel (based on
.18 patches forward-ported onto .26) turned out to have a major regression
issue described in http://bugs.debian.org/534880 that didn't even get
reported until months after the release. Perhaps this particular bug is
specific to the old branch, but then the new paravirt_ops branch may have
some other, newer bugs of its own, so it makes sense to encourage widespread
testing as soon as possible.

My own 2.6.31.6+paravirt_ops dom0 test machine is still working great after
several months, so I'm optimistic. Thanks for all the hard work that made it
happen.

--
    2. That which causes joy or happiness.

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.