[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
On 21/01/2010 12:46, "Weidong Han" <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> If DRHD does not have existent devices, ignore it. >> If DRHD has both existent and non-existent devices, consider it invalid >> and not register. >> > > Although you patch workarounds your buggy BIOS, but we still need to > enable it for security purpose as I mentioned in previous mail. We > needn't workaround / fix all BIOS issues in software. I think security > is more important for this specific BIOS issue. Did you report the BIOS > issue to your OEM vendor? maybe it's better to get it fixed in BIOS. If VT-d cannot be correctly enabled on a particualr system, should we not warn-and-disable (partially disable or completely disable) rather than fail to boot? If we want to fail to boot, that is what the iommu=force option is there for. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |