Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking

[Weidong Han <weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>]

Seems you inserted a discrete gfx card, then the IGD is disabled. right? 
can you provide the platform info and  BIOS version?
Regards,
Weidong

Noboru Iwamatsu wrote:
> Hi Weidong,
>
> Here is the log.
> Xen version is:
> xen-unstable c/s 20829 + return.patch + rmrr.patch
>
> Regards,
> Noboru
>
>   
> > Noboru Iwamatsu wrote:
> >     
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > After registered invalid DRHDs, Xen hangs in boot time.
> > >       
> > Can you post the logs?
> >
> > Regards,
> > Weidong
> >     
> > > About RMRR, I understood the logic.
> > > In my mainboard, unfortunately, RMRR has non-existent device under
> > > its scope, and to make matters worse, the RMRR range is invalid.
> > > So, I think RMRR that has no-existent device is valid.
> > >
> > > How do you think about these?
> > >
> > >       
> > > > Hi Noboru,
> > > >
> > > > You should not ignore DRHD even if devices under its scope are not
> > > > pci discoverable. For the sake of security, we still enable these
> > > > DRHDs but don't set any context mappings. In that case, any DMA that
> > > > comes from these "supposedly disabled" devices will get blocked by
> > > > VT-d, and hence avoid any security vulnerability with malicious s/w
> > > > re-enabling these devices.
> > > >
> > > > You RMRR validity fixing is wrong. My RMRR patch is no problem. Pls
> > > > note that the RMRR checking logic is:
> > > > If all devices under RMRR's scope are not pci discoverable
> > > > Ignore the RMRR
> > > > Else if base_address> end_address
> > > > Return error
> > > > Else
> > > > Register RMRR
> > > >
> > > > Regards,
> > > > Weidong
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -----Original Message-----
> > > > From: Noboru Iwamatsu [mailto:n_iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
> > > > Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2010 4:26 PM
> > > > To: Han, Weidong
> > > > Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > Some Q35 mainboard that has buggy BIOS, I have one of this, reports
> > > > invalid DRHD in addition to the invalid RMRR.
> > > >
> > > > Attached patch fixes this DRHD issue in the same way as RMRR.
> > > > And also, I fixed RMRR validity checking loop.
> > > >
> > > > Noboru.
> > > >
> > > > Signed-off-by: Noboru Iwamatsu<n_iwamatsu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > -------- Original Message --------
> > > > Subject: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] VT-d: improve RMRR validity checking
> > > > From: Han, Weidong<weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > To: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx<xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > > Date: Thu Jan 21 2010 11:46:12 GMT+0900
> > > >
> > > >         
> > > > > Currently, Xen checks RMRR range and disables VT-d if RMRR range is
> > > > > set incorrectly in BIOS rigorously. But, actually we can ignore the
> > > > > RMRR if the device under its scope are not pci discoverable, because
> > > > > the RMRR won't be used by non-existed or disabled devices.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch ignores the RMRR if the device under its scope are not
> > > > > pci discoverable, and only checks the validity of RMRRs that are
> > > > > actually used. In order to avoid duplicate pci device detection
> > > > > code, this patch defines a function pci_device_detect for it.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Weidong Han<weidong.han@xxxxxxxxx>
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > _______________________________________________
> > > > > Xen-devel mailing list
> > > > > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > > > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> > > > >           
> > >       
>   

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel