[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate / graphics passthru
On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 06:24:29PM +0800, Weidong Han wrote: > Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: >> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 05:52:15PM +0800, Weidong Han wrote: >> >>> Jean Guyader wrote: >>> >>>> 2010/1/21 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>: >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 09:09:35AM +0000, Jean Guyader wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> 2010/1/21 Pasi Kärkkäinen <pasik@xxxxxx>: >>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 10:05:12AM +0000, Keir Fraser wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 09:32, "Pasi Kärkkäinen" <pasik@xxxxxx> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Does 4.0 include gpu passthru features? If not are there any updated >>>>>>>>>>> patches to try gpu passthru with 4.x? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> There is support (c/s 20144). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Btw is it possible now to specify a file to load the VGA bios from? >>>>>>>>> earlier it was required to hardcode it into some header file or so. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I think it is hardcoded that qemu will take a copy of the host >>>>>>>> system's BIOS >>>>>>>> (i.e., for the primary host VGA). Other options would be easy to >>>>>>>> implement >>>>>>>> I'm sure, if someone's interested. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> I was just looking at same older mails, and it seems for example Teo En >>>>>>> Ming >>>>>>> and others who got Xen VGA passthrough working had to copy the >>>>>>> vgabios-pt.bin >>>>>>> to tools/firmware/vgabios/ before building Xen. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> That's not very practical.. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Right now the code copy the bios from 0xC0000. So if you want to pass >>>>>> through >>>>>> a secondary display adapter with the vga bios you are not copying the >>>>>> right one, >>>>>> that why this hack was for. >>>>>> Surely the code could be modified to add an option to copy the bios of >>>>>> the right card. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> Ok, thanks for the info. >>>>> >>>>> Do I remember correctly that there was a problem with copying the BIOS >>>>> from some cards, >>>>> or on some setups? And that's why the patch to load it from a file was >>>>> made? >>>>> >>>>> >>>> Yes, I think that was because of that, and I'm not sure about the >>>> intel IGD but I think that was causing some issue. >>>> The code could have a cleanup and use sysfs to get the rombios, if I >>>> works with the intel graphic card I think we should do that. >>>> >>>> Jean >>>> >>> vbios copied from 0xC0000 doesn't work for some graphics cards, e.g. >>> Nvidia GS 8400, due to the vbios code is modified after >>> initialization. So it needs to load it from file. yes, it's not >>> practical, Intel IGD cards don't have this issue in our tests. One >>> possible good solution is to load vbios from expansion ROM of >>> graphics cards, but we found expansion ROM address are invalid for >>> some graphics cards, even using Linux upstream. It needs to look >>> into Linux code. >>> >>> >> >> So at this point should be add two things: >> >> 1) option in guest cfgfile telling from which card to copy the vbios from >> > I think adding an option in guest config file to indicate primary or > secondary gfx assignment can cover this. Ok. >> 2) option to load the vbios from a file specified in guest cfgfile >> > I don't prefer this. It involves much manual work for users. It's better > to find a general solution which is also easy to use. > Can we find a general solution in time for Xen 4.0 release? If not, then a solution requiring manual work is better than compiling from a source on every machine.. Mr. Teo En Ming: Did you try the latest xen-unstable (4.0-rcX) to see if it works for you? -- Pasi _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |