[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate


  • To: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:53:05 -0800 (PST)
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Wed, 13 Jan 2010 09:53:50 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=s1024; d=yahoo.com; h=Message-ID:X-YMail-OSG:Received:X-Mailer:Date:From:Subject:To:Cc:In-Reply-To:MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=a7+GEe25DTqkstgBimdRYkbcKVfHhzvDk5I5xqUWu3fhjnXj9PUanrjeu/Urg0UViorltujwqX7PAudg+1+idHWvGgIDpJWtpaK/T8hId0jOJR0poGj09+9ScYm/8QaSHJHgn5kzYP+Q+ocSnceX8kZrIPejpRdoi7BYcRV+tgU=;
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

Thank you. My mistake.

--- On Wed, 1/13/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 6:03 AM

Yes, the libxenctrl and libxenguest version numbers got bumped. I assume
your xend start failure was because you installed fresh libxenctrl but
didn't upgrade the xend xc.so extension package, which is therefore linked
against the old no-longer-existing version of libxenctrl.

-- Keir

On 13/01/2010 10:37, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> root@ServerJaunty:/# find . -name "libxenctrl..so.*"  -print
>
> ./usr/src/xen-unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib64/libxenctrl.so.4.0
> ./usr/src/xen-unstable.hg/dist/install/usr/lib64/libxenctrl.so.4.0.0
> ./usr/src/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so.4.0
> ./usr/src/xen-unstable.hg/tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so.4.0.0
>
> ./usr/src/xen-3.4-testing.hg/dist/install/usr/lib64/libxenctrl.so.3.4
> ./usr/src/xen-3.4-testing.hg/dist/install/usr/lib64/libxenctrl.so.3.4.0
> ./usr/src/xen-3.4-testing.hg/tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so.3.4
> ./usr/src/xen-3.4-testing.hg/tools/libxc/libxenctrl.so..3.4.0
>
> ./usr/lib/libxenctrl.so.4.0
> ./usr/lib/libxenctrl.so.4.0.0
>
> Due to :
>
> # cd xen-unstable.hg
> # make uninstall
> # make install-xen
> # make install-tools
>
> Boris.
>
> --- On Wed, 1/13/10, Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> From: Boris Derzhavets <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>> To: "Keir Fraser" <keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Wednesday, January 13, 2010, 5:26 AM
>>
>> Just performed fresh clone , build and install xen 4.0-rc2-pre:-
>>
>> Recent CSc :-
>>
>> changeset:   20796:13d4e78ede97
>> tag:         tip
>> user:        Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> date:        Wed Jan 13 08:33:34 2010 +0000
>> summary:     x86 hvm: Change default setting of guest CPUID RDTSCP bit
>>
>> changeset:   20795:6512068aa0db
>> user:        Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> date:        Wed Jan 13 08:18:38 2010 +0000
>> summary:     x86: fix unmaskable msi assignment issue.
>>
>> changeset:   20794:3f8fd65732cc
>> user:        Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> date:        Wed Jan 13 08:17:00 2010 +0000
>> summary:     x86: minor cleanup to arch_memory_op()
>>
>> changeset:   20793:4573383ec3dd
>> user:        Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> date:        Wed Jan 13 08:16:37 2010 +0000
>> summary:     Update Xen version to 4.0.0-rc2-pre
>>
>> ............................
>>
>> Attempt to start xend:-
>>
>> root@ServerJaunty:~# /etc/init.d/xend start
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon..py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen..xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon..py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen..xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2..6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen.lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>> .Traceback (most recent call last):
>>   File "/usr/sbin/xend", line 36, in <module>
>>     from xen.xend.server import SrvDaemon
>>   File "/usr/lib/python2.6/dist-packages/xen/xend/server/SrvDaemon.py", line
>> 20, in <module>
>>     import xen..lowlevel.xc
>> ImportError: libxenctrl.so.3.4: cannot open shared object file: No such file
>> or directory
>>
>>
>> Boris.
>>
>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 4:09 PM
>>>
>>> Weird, looks like the changesets are not applied to your checked-out copy of
>>> the tree. What happens if you try 'hg update tip' first? The other option is
>>> to binary-chop changesets between tip (c/s 20790) and the last known good
>>> changeset:
>>> hg update 20750 (for example)
>>> Build, install, test...
>>> hg update 20770 (if previous test succeeded, meaning bug is between
>>> changesets 20751 and 20790)
>>> Build, install, test...
>>>
>>> And so on. Rather tedious unfortunately..
>>>
>>>  -- Keir
>>>
>>> On 12/01/2010 19:52, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I cannot handle that :-
>>>>
>>>> root@ServerJaunty:/usr/src/xen-unstable.hg# hg export 20762 | patch -Rp1
>>>> patching file tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c
>>>> Unreversed patch detected!  Ignore -R? [n] n
>>>> Apply anyway? [n] y
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 1078.
>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 1105.
>>>> Hunk #3 FAILED at 1117.
>>>> 3 out of 3 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>> tools/python/xen/lowlevel/xc/xc.c.rej
>>>> patching file xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom0_ops.c
>>>> Unreversed patch detected!  Ignore -R? [n] n
>>>> Apply anyway? [n] y
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 715.
>>>> 1 out of 1 hunk FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>> xen/arch/ia64/xen/dom0_ops.c..rej
>>>> patching file xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c
>>>> Unreversed patch detected!  Ignore -R? [n] n
>>>> Apply anyway? [n] y
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 64.
>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 75.
>>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file xen/arch/x86/sysctl.c.rej
>>>> patching file xen/include/public/sysctl.h
>>>> Unreversed patch detected!  Ignore -R? [n] n
>>>> Apply anyway? [n] y
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 34.
>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 94.
>>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>> xen/include/public/sysctl..h.rej
>>>> patching file xen/include/xen/nodemask.h
>>>> Unreversed patch detected!  Ignore -R? [n] -R
>>>> Apply anyway? [n] y
>>>> Hunk #1 FAILED at 38..
>>>> Hunk #2 FAILED at 214.
>>>> 2 out of 2 hunks FAILED -- saving rejects to file
>>>> xen/include/xen/nodemask.h..rej
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 2:32 PM
>>>>>
>>>>> hg export 20762 | patch -Rp1
>>>>> hg export 20767 | patch -Rp1
>>>>> ...then rebuild and reinstall Xen and dom0 tools.
>>>>> Afterwards, to revert the above:
>>>>> hg diff | patch -Rp1
>>>>>
>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>
>>>>> On 12/01/2010 18:34, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, i need an exact commands to revert to two CSs.
>>>>>> Googling doesn't help for sure. Otherwise , it doesn't make sense.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Boris.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "
>>>>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 11:59 AM
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hm, nothing recent looks especially likely to cause this. Maybe c/s
>>>>>>> 20767,
>>>>>>> if the format string it modifies is still incorrect after the change. It
>>>>>>> might be interesting to revert 20767 and 20762 and see if the problem
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> occurs.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 15:50, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > > wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I did clone of xen-unstable.hg about 10-12 days ago on the same box and
>>>>>>>> it
>>>>>>>> worked. That's one of the recent CSs.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Boris.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4..0.0 first release candidate
>>>>>>>>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > "
>>>>>>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 10:29 AM
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any idea when this last worked in xen-unstable?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 15:18, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2..6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of
>>>>>>>>>> Ubuntu
>>>>>>>>>> 9.04
>>>>>>>>>> server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
>>>>>>>>>> dmesg :-
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> . . .. . . . . .
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> [  499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3
>>>>>>>>>> sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>> [  505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>>>>>>>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9..so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Boris.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>>>>>>>>> To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > "
>>>>>>>>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel
>>>>>>>>>>> includes
>>>>>>>>>>> dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project,
>>>>>>>>>>> or
>>>>>>>>>>> Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by
>>>>>>>>>>> default
>>>>>>>>>>> by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that
>>>>>>>>>>> doesn't
>>>>>>>>>>> mean you *have* to use it.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel
>>>>>>>>>>>> version
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> version support?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>>>>>>> version from Jeremy branches?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default
>>>>>>>>>>>> with
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
>>>>>>>>>>>> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not
>>>>>>>>>>>> include a
>>>>>>>>>>>> dom0
>>>>>>>>>>>> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in
>>>>>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>>>> kernel
>>>>>>>>>>>> mainline?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have
>>>>>>>>>>>> Xen
>>>>>>>>>>>> Dom0
>>>>>>>>>>>> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>>>>>>>>>>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen..devel/75992>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open
>>>>>>>>>>>> source
>>>>>>>>>>>> this
>>>>>>>>>>>> amazing virtualization system.
>>>>>>>>>>>> Sassy
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser
>>>>>>>>>>>> <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir....fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir...fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > >
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and
>>>>>>>>>>>>> published.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> You can grab it from here:
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4..0.0-rc1')
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Please test it!
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > >
>>>>>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>
>>>> 
>>>
>>>
>>
>> 
>>
>> -----Inline Attachment Follows-----
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>




_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.