Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate

[Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Hm, nothing recent looks especially likely to cause this. Maybe c/s 20767,
if the format string it modifies is still incorrect after the change. It
might be interesting to revert 20767 and 20762 and see if the problem still
occurs.

 -- Keir

On 12/01/2010 15:50, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> I did clone of xen-unstable.hg about 10-12 days ago on the same box and it
> worked. That's one of the recent CSs.
> 
> Boris.
> 
> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>> To: "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx>
>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 10:29 AM
>> 
>> Any idea when this last worked in xen-unstable?
>> 
>>  -- Keir
>> 
>> On 12/01/2010 15:18, "Boris Derzhavets" <bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx
>> </mc/compose?to=bderzhavets@xxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>> 
>>> Attempt to load Xen 4.0-rc1 with 2.6.31.6 pvops kernel on top of Ubuntu 9.04
>>> server. ( Xen 3.4.3-rc1-pre loads fine with any kernel) :-
>>> dmesg :-
>>> 
>>> . . . . . . . .
>>> 
>>> [  499.890371] xend[1609]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895af sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  499.905480] xend[1612]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  499.934416] xend[1620]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  499.949121] xend[1623]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  499.988220] xend[1633]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  500.013995] xend[1641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  500.053252] xend[1652]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  500.069849] xend[1657]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  500.085520] xend[1660]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c8 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.907064] __ratelimit: 205 callbacks suppressed
>>> [  504.907070] xend[2628]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.922303] xend[2631]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.937531] xend[2634]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.952277] xend[2638]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.966630] xend[2641]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.981380] xend[2644]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  504.996759] xend[2647]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  505..012018] xend[2650]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  505.026693] xend[2653]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> [  505.041834] xend[2656]: segfault at 26f9000 ip 00007f8e61f895c3 sp
>>> 00007f8e5e1b4e28 error 6 in libc-2.9.so[7f8e61f06000+168000]
>>> 
>>> Boris.
>>> 
>>> --- On Tue, 1/12/10, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Subject: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen 4.0.0 first release candidate
>>>> To: "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> "
>>>> <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> Date: Tuesday, January 12, 2010, 6:38 AM
>>>> 
>>>> You can use any kernel as dom0 for Xen 4.0, so long as that kernel includes
>>>> dom0 support. So that could be 2.6.18, or 2.6.27 from XCI project, or
>>>> Jeremy's pv_ops git tree, or some distro kernel. The kernel built by
>>>> default
>>>> by the Xen 4.0 build system will be Jeremy's pv_ops tree, but that doesn't
>>>> mean you *have* to use it.
>>>> 
>>>>  -- Keir
>>>> 
>>>> On 12/01/2010 11:31, "Sassy Natan" <sassyn@xxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=sassyn@xxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>> wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> Hi Keir, Xen Group ...
>>>>>  
>>>>> Just to make things more clear, I wanted to know which kernel version this
>>>>> version support?
>>>>> Is it still work with the old stable kernel 2.6.18 or should I grub the
>>>>> new
>>>>> version from Jeremy branches?
>>>>>  
>>>>> To my understating version 4.0 of xen is plan to work by default with the
>>>>> pv_ops mechanism on the dom0.
>>>>> But at the moment the latest stable kernel 2.6.32.3 does not include a
>>>>> dom0
>>>>> support but only domU support (both oldstyle and pv_ops).
>>>>>  
>>>>> So, Does the release of Xen 4.0 is plan to include Dom0 support in the
>>>>> kernel
>>>>> mainline?
>>>>>  
>>>>> According to Jeremy there is quite more work to do in-order to have Xen
>>>>> Dom0
>>>>> support in the kernel mainline. see more here:
>>>>> http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen.devel/75992
>>>>> <http://article.gmane.org/gmane.comp.emulators.xen..devel/75992>
>>>>>  
>>>>> Can you please provide more feedback on this issue?
>>>>>  
>>>>>  
>>>>> Thanks for the support, and thanks for publishing to the open source this
>>>>> amazing virtualization system.
>>>>> Sassy 
>>>>> On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 9:33 AM, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir..fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>> </mc/compose?to=keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>> Folks,
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> The first release candidate for Xen 4.0.0 has been tagged and published.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> You can grab it from here:
>>>>>> http://xenbits.xensource.com/xen-unstable.hg (tagged '4.0.0-rc1')
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Please test it!
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>  -- Keir
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Xen-devel mailing list
>>>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>> </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> >
>>>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
>>> 
>>>  
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> Xen-devel mailing list
>> Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx </mc/compose?to=Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>> http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
> 
>  



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel