[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Re: A question about changeset 20621:f9392f6eda79 and Discontinuous online node
On 06/01/2010 09:46, "Jiang, Yunhong" <yunhong.jiang@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> Yes, I think actually that would be a bug fix, given how tools currently use >>> the nr_nodes field. Feel free to send a patch as part of your fix-up work: I >>> don't think even changing the field name is necessary, but we can add a >>> comemnt to sysctl.h. >> >> Actually I think we should change the nr_cpus field in the same way, and may >> as well change their names to max_cpu_id and max_node_id. I'll look into >> this myself. > > Why we need change the nr_cpus? It has max_cpu_id already. > Thanks that you will look into this. Yes, true. So I only changed nr_nodes field. I checked in a patch as c/s 20762. I didn't change any Python code -- just up as far as the Python C extension. -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |