[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] build problems


  • To: Ian Campbell <Ian.Campbell@xxxxxxxxxx>
  • From: Justin Ferguson <jnferguson@xxxxxxxxx>
  • Date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 03:10:12 -0700
  • Cc: "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
  • Delivery-date: Tue, 29 Dec 2009 02:10:33 -0800
  • Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; b=NtzTUK6zKuGeZ8Xu0QM2UMBd87LCIelZy5O8qmGTJAFxXEx1pZsFgwcCl8txYZqDHG n6A4lTD9Hg/rGMeXnB3mf6GoMxOOOMZ/U4uh6wwAiY2VXi/0SHxD4apxb4NmNJrjBacf XQpIgA5mCBAKc+hAUpgOIZBRBSB2HDLVa0ARc=
  • List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>

>> You can most assuredly use a 2.6.18 bzImage for dom0 -- Xen knows what
>> to do with it.
>
> Unless someone backported the v2.08 bzImage format extensions (which I
> don't think is the case) then you cannot boot a 2.6.18 bzImage under
> Xen, that support relies on newer fields in the header. IIRC those
> patches went into 2.6.27 upstream, although e.g. Debian backported them
> to their 2.6.26 kernel.
>
> For 2.6.18 I think you still need to use the old compressed-ELF style
> kernels.

Which, may be a problem with my grub config-- but i dont think it is,
I can't seem to get grub 2 to boot the resultant vmlinux/zImage, it
just likes to tell me its missing the magic number-- which I'm
guessing, and my knowledge gets hazy here, is a result of it not being
a multiboot compatible image?

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel


 


Rackspace

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.