[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] add the two command to add or delete the usb device instead of do it in QEMU console
Yes, you are right. Sorry, I'll send the patch. Pasi KÃrkkÃinen wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 20, 2009 at 01:26:19AM -0600, James Song wrote: >> I rewrite the patch, pls check. I also put those as attachments. >> >> Thanks, >> -James >> >> Signed-off-by: James Song Wei <[1]jsong@xxxxxxxxxx> >> > >> diff -r 0705efd9c69e tools/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py >> --- a/tools/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py Fri Oct 16 09:04:53 >> 2009 >> +0100 >> +++ b/tools/python/xen/xend/server/SrvDomain.py Mon Oct 19 10:15:06 >> 2009 >> +0800 >> @@ -225,6 +225,19 @@ >> self.acceptCommand(req) >> return self.xd.domain_reset(self.dom.getName()) >> >> + def op_usb_add(self, op, req): >> + self.acceptCommand(req) >> + return req.threadRequest(self.do_usb_add, op, req) >> + >> + def do_usb_add(self, _, req): >> + return self.xd.domain_usb_add(self.dom.getName(), req) >> + >> + def op_usb_del(self, op, req): >> + self.acceptCommand(req) >> + return req.threadRequest(self.do_usb_add, op, req) >> + >> + def do_usb_del(self, _, req): >> + return self.xd.domain_usb_add(self.dom.getName(), req) >> > > Hello, > > Shouldn't op_usb_del() use do_usb_del() and do_usb_del() use > domain_usb_del() ? > > Or did I miss something? > > -- Pasi > > > _______________________________________________ > Xen-devel mailing list > Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel > > -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/add-the-two-command-to-add-or-delete-the-usb-device-instead-of-do-it-in-QEMU-console-tp25970825p26772284.html Sent from the Xen - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |