[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] pvops DomU kernels [was Re: "Hotplug Scripts not working ..." error on jaunty]
On 10/21/09 22:56, Dulloor wrote: > console/network/everything is fine with the 2.6.18 DomU (on pvops DomU > and on Ubuntu 9.04 server). I assume it would be so with the any other > forward port too (2.6.27, for instance). > > The problem is with the pvops DomU kernel. > 1. With Linus' git tree (CONFIG_XEN and other DomU options compiled > in), the kernel crashes with the following (in xm dmesg) : > (XEN) mm.c:840:d33 Error getting mfn 18c3 (pfn 21603) from L1 entry > 80000000018c3061 for l1e_owner=33, pg_owner=33 > (XEN) traps.c:465:d33 Unhandled invalid opcode fault/trap [#6] on VCPU > 0 [ec=0000] > (XEN) domain_crash_sync called from entry.S > (XEN) Domain 33 (vcpu#0) crashed on cpu#7: > (XEN) ----[ Xen-3.5-unstable x86_64 debug=y Not tainted ]---- > (XEN) CPU: 7 Where in the boot does this happen? Does anything appear on the Linux console? Is there a rip/eip you can map to a kernel symbol? > 2. With Jeremy's git, i.e the same kernel as Dom0 (but with CONFIG_XEN > and other DomU options compiled in), the kernel just freezes in > init_intel function > (start_kernel->...->identify_boot_cpu->...->c_init). To be more > precise, in detect_extended_topology function. Also, for the DomU, the > init_intel function in "arch/x86/kernel/cpu/intel.c" gets executed > rather than the function in "setup-xen.c". I am not well-versed the > setup code in pvops. Does that look fine ? Which setup-xen.c would that be? The normal CPU setup is supposed to be run, but the extended topology info is rather meaningless in a Xen guest. I think the right answer is to knobble it in xen_cpuid(), assuming it isn't stuff that Xen should be suppressing. Does this work? diff --git a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c index fb7ebc6..ecb9b0d 100644 --- a/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c +++ b/arch/x86/xen/enlighten.c @@ -186,6 +186,7 @@ static __read_mostly unsigned int cpuid_leaf81_edx_mask = ~0; static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx, unsigned int *cx, unsigned int *dx) { + unsigned maskebx = ~0; unsigned maskecx = ~0; unsigned maskedx = ~0; @@ -199,6 +200,11 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx, maskedx = cpuid_leaf1_edx_mask; break; + case 0xb: + /* Suppress extended topology stuff */ + maskebx = 0; + break; + case 0x80000001: maskedx = cpuid_leaf81_edx_mask; break; @@ -211,6 +217,7 @@ static void xen_cpuid(unsigned int *ax, unsigned int *bx, "=d" (*dx) : "0" (*ax), "2" (*cx)); + *bx &= maskebx; *cx &= maskecx; *dx &= maskedx; } > > I have attached the configs for both 1 and 2. > > thanks > dulloor > > PS : Also, DomU compilation (with just DomU options compiled in) fails > with the following error, if CONFIG_SMP is not defined - > arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c: In function ‘pvclock_clocksource_vread’: > arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:172: error: implicit declaration of function > ‘fix_to_virt’ > arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:172: error: ‘FIX_PVCLOCK_TIME_INFO’ > undeclared (first use in this function) > arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c:172: error: (Each undeclared identifier is > reported only once Does this fix it? diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c index 0bed867..f47f91e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/pvclock.c @@ -21,6 +21,7 @@ #include <asm/pvclock.h> #include <asm/vsyscall.h> +#include <asm/fixmap.h> #include <asm/vgtod.h> /* J _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |