[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???

To: Jan Beulich <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
From: Keir Fraser <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:31:27 +0100
Cc:
Delivery-date: Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:31:55 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: AcpSQCR6dgYnh2N5Tue6PhpGFVj0CwAAeJjG
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???

On 21/10/2009 12:18, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> Are these planned to be used for something? Or are they dead remains of
> some earlier code? At least they don't seem to be used in current code in
> any way, and if they were they would represent an artificial limitation to
> 256 physcial CPUs...

They're relics. Should be removed.

 -- Keir



_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

References:
- [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: Re: [Xen-devel] Re: [xen-discuss] possible memory-leak in qemu-dm
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [drm:r100_ring_test] *ERROR* radeon: ring test failed
Previous by thread: [Xen-devel] XEN_DOMINF_cpu{mask,shift} ???
Next by thread: [Xen-devel] Need help in debugging partially blocked hypervisor
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.