[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel][PV-ops][PATCH 2/2] VNIF(netfront): Using smart polling instead of event notification.
On Thu, 2009-10-01 at 01:09 +0100, Xu, Dongxiao wrote: > - Netfront uses a timer to poll the ring instead of event channel > notification. If guest is transferring data, the timer will start > working and periodicaly send/receive data from ring. If guest is > idle and no data is transferring, the timer will stop working > automatically. It will restart again once there is new data > transferring. Doesn't the RING_PUSH_REQUESTS_AND_CHECK_NOTIFY macro already give effectively this behaviour? Assuming your patch adds further benefit over CHECK_NOTIFY isn't this similar to what NAPI does, is there any reason not to use the NAPI infrastructure in the kernel to implement it? Ian. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |