[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] another regression from IRQ handling changes
On 22/09/2009 10:53, "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > I wouldn't base this on the passed in IRQ number, but instead on the > number of IRQs mapped - if the proposed array doesn't have a spare > slot anymore, switch to passing back the magic vector (and assume > pirq == irq in ioapic_guest_write() - we could even add checking of > that for all previously enabled IRQs this relation is true, and fail > PHYSDEVOP_alloc_irq_vector if the array got exhausted and Dom0 > didn't use only GSIs before). But besides that detail your idea sounds > fine at least from a Linux perspective. > > Are you planning on getting this done, or should I? Feel free to go ahead. Unfortunately I guess neither of us can properly test this case? :-( -- Keir _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |