[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] cpu_*(), #define, and &
I hope I'm not bikeshedding here (http://catb.org/jargon/html/B/bikeshedding.html), but I'm not really happy with the cpu_*() macros in cpumask.h adding ampersands before the arguments. In C (as opposed to C++), passing a non-pointer generally means that no values are going to be changed. Other than Linux similarity, is there a good reason to do this in a macro, rather than just having the caller provide the &? Would anyone object to me submitting a patch to change that? (A patch to change it looks to be rather big and boring, so I want to talk about it first before doing it...) -George _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |