[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] [Xen-devel] RE: vtsc in domain builder
> Was this change due to some backward compatibility reason? I found the compatibility issue describe here: http://xen.markmail.org/message/usjxnjyp3csm3uct?q=superpages+date:200907 So it seems even more important that I somehow claim a field (or at least a bit) in struct xc_dom_image. Any help to get this right would be appreciated as getting it wrong clearly has some non-obvious consequences. Thanks, Dan > -----Original Message----- > From: Dan Magenheimer > Sent: Tuesday, September 15, 2009 3:58 PM > To: Xen-Devel (E-mail) > Subject: vtsc in domain builder > > > I'm working on passing vtsc=[0|1] (rdtsc emulation) from > the vm.cfg file into xen. > > I was using the superpages vm.cfg implementation as a guide, > but I see the domain builder interface for superpages changed > in c/s 19963 to pass the value via a flag in a pad byte in > struct xc_dom_image. Was this change due to some backward > compatibility reason? This looks like a nicer interface, > but is there another pad byte I can/should use? If not, > what's the best way then to pass the vtsc value from the > tools to Xen? > > Also, will I be able to use the same interface for both > HVM and PV, or should I use the HVM param interface for > HVM domains (using the HPET parameter as a model)? > > Thanks, > Dan > _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |