[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

RE: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???

To: "Jan Beulich" <JBeulich@xxxxxxxxxx>, "Keir Fraser" <keir.fraser@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, "Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk" <konrad.wilk@xxxxxxxxxx>
From: "James Harper" <james.harper@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 19:15:10 +1000
Cc: xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 15 Sep 2009 02:15:55 -0700
List-id: Xen developer discussion <xen-devel.lists.xensource.com>
Thread-index: Aco12kXZv43Qu5EYSomcqhEARC0HkQACpybg
Thread-topic: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???

> >They may have moved XenVMMXenVMM out of the way to another leaf? Like
we do
> >with the checked-in Viridian shim.
> 
> Yes, to 0x40001xxx.
> 

I think I only check up to 0x0FFF (I think that's all the HVM Linux
drivers do). What is a reasonable ceiling?

James

_______________________________________________
Xen-devel mailing list
Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel

Follow-Ups:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
  - From: Jan Beulich

References:
- RE: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
  - From: James Harper
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
  - From: Keir Fraser
- Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
  - From: Jan Beulich

Prev by Date: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] Add more features to xenoprof
Next by Date: [Xen-devel] Re: [Fedora-xen] 2.6.31-1.2.65.xendom0.fc12.x86_64 crash on boot
Previous by thread: Re: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
Next by thread: RE: [Xen-devel] Xen Signature == "NovellShimHv" ???
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our
servers 24x7x365 and backed by RackSpace's Fanatical Support®.