|
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] Nvidia, Xen, and Vt-d
Jeremy Fitzhardinge wrote: I suspected as much, although I don't understand the origin of the lspci discrepancies between booting with/without the hypervisor. It seems to me that there is some problem with Xen's view of the PCI bus, as well as the fact that the Nvidia driver is trying to access something outside of the hooked APIs. The graphics cards in the system are the dual GPU, dual slot cards, and maybe this is contributing to the problem. I'm going to see about getting some other single slot Nvidia card and see if the same issue happens. I may pick up some ATI cards as well.On 09/09/09 01:56, Keir Fraser wrote:On 09/09/2009 09:47, "Michael J Coss" <mjcoss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:I've tried 3.4.1, and the lastest xen-unstable. I've tried the pv-ops git tree as I really need a 2.6.31 dom0 kernel for other reasons, but for the moment I'd just like to get to the point where I have Xen, and dom0 and Nvidia playing nicely with one another, so I can move on to working on Vt-d and graphic pass through. Any suggestions?Unless you really must have 2.6.30+, I'd recommend the 2.6.27 tree and patchqueue from http://xenbits.xensource.com/XCI. Otherwise you are likely to have to get your hands fairly dirty with pv_ops. For example, afaik starting an X server on pv_ops is still pretty ambitious on some systems. ---Michael J Coss _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |