[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index] Re: [Xen-devel] [PATCH] x86: add an extra check when validating a huge pv L2 entry
On 09/09/2009 17:15, "Michael J Coss" <mjcoss@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> Oh, yes - I got confused (again) by the inconsistencies in what return >> values mean for the various functions. >> >> Jan >> > I don't think that that's correct. The else clause is for the > mfn_valid(m) failure case, and it seems appropriate to set the rc to > some non-zero value. You're confused - look at the surrounding context of the patch. Anyway, I ultimately checked in soemthing even clearer, as c/s 20189. K. _______________________________________________ Xen-devel mailing list Xen-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.xensource.com/xen-devel
|
![]() |
Lists.xenproject.org is hosted with RackSpace, monitoring our |